AAO Decisions — Page 5
Browse AAO decision summaries, with original USCIS sources. Archive page 5 of 16.
Media, scholarly work, and leading role met initial criteria. The AAO remanded to assess acclaim and whether proposed consulting work stayed within the expertise.
Artistic display was credited, but award, membership, and media evidence fell short. Remuneration and final merits were reserved.
The AAO credited two EB-1A criteria for a Cuban musician but dismissed because the record did not establish a third criterion or sustained acclaim.
The AAO accepted artistic contributions and display, considered piano and music-direction work together, but found no third category established.
The AAO counted two criteria, rejected the remaining claims, and denied the certified petition.
Read the source-backed explanation of APR182013_01B2203, the AAO's actual findings, and corrections to the previous article.
A lawyer’s reopening and reconsideration motions failed on publication timing, unexplained representative duties, and the applicable motion requirements.
The Director credited judging and artistic display; the AAO rejected added claims and found no third criterion, with final merits not formally reached.
The AAO accepted Polish national-team membership but found awards, media, and the claimed team role insufficient on this record.
Read the source-backed explanation of APR182018_02B2203, the AAO's actual findings, and corrections to the previous article.
Key Art Awards and documented judging met two categories, but other claims remained unproven. The AAO corrected parts of the denial and still dismissed the appeal.
Key Art Awards and judging were accepted despite flaws in the Director’s analysis, but the advertising art director did not establish three categories.
Denial affirmed: award recognition and receipt were unproven, article metadata and certified translations were missing, and a charity event did not establish a leading role. Final merits also failed.
Source-reviewed summary of this AAO decision, the evidence assessed, and the stated outcome.
The AAO rejected five analyzed criteria and also found no sustained acclaim at final merits. Evidence about crew-chief awards, team roles, press, and pay did not establish eligibility.
A financial manager relied on four anecdotal letters about work before 2000. The AAO found no criterion established and also conducted an aggregate final-merits review.
Read this corrected decision summary for Apr192012_01B2203, with the original disposition, source passages, and USCIS PDF.
Read Apr192012_02B2203, its procedural history, the AAO’s actual disposition, and page-linked corrections to the earlier summary.
The AAO found a farrier’s high salary criterion met and recognized a critical role for one distinguished stable, but the applicable criteria required evidence in the plural.
Read this corrected decision summary for Apr192012_04B2203, with the original disposition, source passages, and USCIS PDF.
Read Apr192012_05B2203, its procedural history, the AAO’s actual disposition, and page-linked corrections to the earlier summary.
The Director had reviewed eight categories and final merits. The AAO summarily dismissed an appeal that did not challenge any specific legal or factual finding.
Source-reviewed summary of this AAO decision, the evidence assessed, and the stated outcome.
The AAO found only two criteria met: judging and scholarly authorship.
Read this corrected decision summary for Apr192012_11B2203, with the original disposition, source passages, and USCIS PDF.
The AAO accepted media and judging but withdrew artistic display and rejected the role category under its historical multiple-organization interpretation.
The AAO accepted the case’s three-criterion threshold and dismissed after assessing the complete record of professional work and recognition.
The record did not establish award recognition, major contributions, publication, or a qualifying role, and lacked evidence of intended continued U.S. research.
Read this corrected decision summary for Apr202009_01B2203, with the original disposition, source passages, and USCIS PDF.
The AAO dismissed this non-precedent appeal, finding that the petitioner met none of the ten criteria.
Read this corrected decision summary for Apr202012_02B2203, with the original disposition, source passages, and USCIS PDF.
Read this corrected decision summary for Apr202012_04B2203, with the original disposition, source passages, and USCIS PDF.
Judging, scholarly authorship, and a critical institutional role met three criteria; the AAO credited a corroborated cardiothoracic surgery record at final merits.
SCOPS found four threshold criteria, but the AAO dismissed the appeal after final-merits review found insufficient evidence of sustained acclaim or standing at the top of the field.
Read Apr212008_01B2203, its procedural history, the AAO’s actual disposition, and page-linked corrections to the earlier summary.
The development director had met the initial evidence threshold but lost at final merits. New motions failed to address the latest decision or supply new facts.
Read APR212025_02B2203, its procedural history, the AAO’s actual disposition, and page-linked corrections to the earlier summary.
The AAO withdrew media credit, rejected authorship and display, and reserved original contributions and role for the marketing strategist.
The AAO found the writer’s self-published material, claimed awards, critiques, impact assertions, and advertising income insufficient in this 2008 decision.
The Moscow festival prize was accepted as a lesser internationally recognized award, but not the one-time major achievement; media supplied only a second category.