AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision Apr202007_03B2203: agriculture research and failure to meet the three‑criterion threshold (waiver/abandonment)

A certificate of merit or local society membership alone is insufficient; the AAO requires clear, verifiable evidence of national/international recognition, published work with proper citation, and documented leading roles. no proof the award is nationally or internationally recognized or covered by

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID Apr202007_03B2203 Decision date not stated in the extraction Outcome dismissed Field or occupation agriculture research Final merits discussed Yes

Criteria Discussed

  • awards

  • leading_critical_role

  • membership

  • original_contributions

  • published_material

  • scholarly_articles

Criteria Accepted

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

Criteria Rejected

  • awards

  • leading_critical_role

  • membership

  • original_contributions

  • published_material

  • scholarly_articles

Core Lesson

A certificate of merit or local society membership alone is insufficient; the AAO requires clear, verifiable evidence of national/international recognition, published work with proper citation, and documented leading roles.

Evidence Issue

  • no proof the award is nationally or internationally recognized or covered by media

  • no documentation that membership meets regulatory standards

  • no independent evidence that original contributions were widely influential or reproduced

  • no indicia of publication for the manuscript (journal title, pagination, etc.)

  • no evidence the research appointment was a leading or critical role

  • failure to meet at least three of the ten regulatory criteria

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.