AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision Apr192011_04B2203

EB‑1A petitions must provide concrete, category‑specific evidence for at least three of the ten regulatory criteria; without any qualifying documentation the petition will be dismissed. lack of any qualifying evidence under the ten EB‑1A regulatory categories; failure to meet the statutory requireme

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID Apr192011_04B2203 Decision date not stated in the extraction Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed Yes

Criteria Discussed

  • artistic_display

  • awards

  • commercial_success

  • high_salary

  • judging

  • leading_critical_role

  • membership

  • original_contributions

  • published_material

  • scholarly_articles

Criteria Accepted

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

Criteria Rejected

  • artistic_display

  • awards

  • commercial_success

  • high_salary

  • judging

  • leading_critical_role

  • membership

  • original_contributions

  • published_material

  • scholarly_articles

Core Lesson

EB‑1A petitions must provide concrete, category‑specific evidence for at least three of the ten regulatory criteria; without any qualifying documentation the petition will be dismissed.

Evidence Issue

  • lack of any qualifying evidence under the ten EB‑1A regulatory categories

  • failure to meet the statutory requirement of evidence in at least three categories

  • no documentation of sustained national or international acclaim

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.