AAO research
AAO EB-1A decision APR202016_01B2203
Demonstrating extensive peer‑review activity, session‑moderating, and a large body of high‑quality publications can satisfy the judging, leading‑role, and scholarly‑articles criteria and meet the “top of the field” standard. The decision shows a generic successful combination of judging, leading‑rol
Decision Snapshot
Field Value --- --- Decision ID APR202016_01B2203 Decision date not stated Outcome sustained Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed Yes
Criteria Discussed
judging
leading_critical_role
scholarly_articles
Criteria Accepted
judging
leading_critical_role
scholarly_articles
Criteria Rejected
Not stated in the extracted decision plan.
Core Lesson
Demonstrating extensive peer‑review activity, session‑moderating, and a large body of high‑quality publications can satisfy the judging, leading‑role, and scholarly‑articles criteria and meet the “top of the field” standard.
Evidence Issue
Not stated in the extracted decision plan.
How This Connects
This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.
Source Note
Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.