Direct answer: EB-1A Evidence Combinations: Waiver, abandonment, and issues left undecided organizes source-reviewed AAO material around one research question and links readers to the underlying decision records.

This topic is a research lens across the source-reviewed corpus. Candidate keyword matches are discovery aids only; each linked record retains its own procedural stage and the exact issue decided. This page makes no claim that keyword matches are a validated cohort or a legal rule.

How the case examples were selected

The linked decisions are examples for topic discovery from the completed source-review matrix. They do not represent every matching record, prove a universal standard, or establish an approval probability. Open each source and compare the issue, evidence, date, and procedural stage.

Source-reviewed decision examples

• JAN102023_03B2203 — Combined motion dismissed.
  Narrow procedural example on abandoned issues, first-time assertions, and evidence timing; not a new criteria merits decision. Official decision PDF.

• APR082019_01B2203 — Appeal dismissed
  Useful as an individual, nonprecedential case example about the cited criterion findings and procedural outcome; avoid broad generalizations and compare only with factually similar field, criterion, evidence type, adjudication era, and procedural posture. Official decision PDF.

• JUL102013_01B2203 — Appeal dismissed
  Use as a dated, fact-specific, nonprecedential example. Compare only cases with aligned field, criterion evidence, procedural posture, filing/adjudication period, and final-merits stage. Preserve posture and threshold/final-merits distinction. Official decision PDF.

• MAY282009_01B2203 — Appeal dismissed
  Developmental biology research; distinguish promising future potential and routine scholarly activity from established impact and recognition as of the filing date. Official decision PDF.

• NOV252016_01B2203 — Appeal dismissed
  Fashion/accessory design; handle the material-misrepresentation finding prominently and separately from ordinary criterion analysis; do not treat altered evidence as a typical criterion precedent. Official decision PDF.

• MAR192009_01B2203 — Appeal dismissed
  Competitive shooting and coaching; keep comparison within shooting disciplines and distinguish dated competition results from acclaim sustained through filing. Official decision PDF.

• JUL022024_03B2203 — Appeal dismissed
  Film production design; preserve the Director’s single artistic-display finding and distinguish a film’s award from an individual award to the petitioner. Official decision PDF.

• SEP162005_03B2203 — Appeal dismissed
  Use as a dated, case-specific nonprecedent decision. Compare only decisions with matching field, regulatory period, claimed criterion, and procedural posture. Preserve accepted versus rejected criteria and any abandonment or final-merits distinction; do not treat outcomes as predictive. Official decision PDF.

• NOV032012_10B2203 — Appeal dismissed; see cited pages.
  Potential comparator for clinical/alternative-treatment claims: distinguish an individual anecdote, a conference presentation, publication, reproducibility, and independent validation. Preserve 2012 legal context. Individual source-cited case page; consider a tightly scoped evidence-quality cluster with clinical research cases only. Official decision PDF.

• JUN042009_05B2203 — Appeal dismissed
  Industrial design, advertising, product displays, and awards; distinguish award recognition from the individual’s sales or employer success. Official decision PDF.

• OCT042005_13B2203 — Appeal dismissed
  Computer science faculty, research, peer review, and salary; compare by discipline and academic career stage only where source facts support it. Official decision PDF.

• SEP152010_01B2203 — Appeal dismissed; petition denied
  Compare only where field, criterion, procedural posture, legal era, and final-merits posture align; preserve case-specific facts and avoid generalizing findings. Official decision PDF.

• MAY292008_04B2203 — Appeal dismissed
  Physics research and academic career stage; note that this older decision includes an aggregate merits discussion even though current templates often reserve a separate two-step analysis. Official decision PDF.

• JAN022014_01B2203 — Appeal dismissed
  Useful for historic-preservation/art-restoration comparisons, especially separating rare skill and supportive letters from major field impact, publication proof, and exhibition evidence. Official decision PDF.

• MAR132007_01B2203 — Appeal dismissed
  Useful for performing-arts comparison on nominations versus awards, ensemble roles, proof of commercial success, and prospective-benefit analysis; date line itself is partly illegible. Official decision PDF.

• MAY292008_05B2203 — Appeal dismissed
  The AAO rejected published-material, artistic-display, high-salary, and commercial-success claims, while finding a leading/critical role criterion met. The record did not establish the required initial threshold or extraordinary ability. Content use should preserve the source-specific procedural posture and avoid generalizing a nonprecedential decision. Official decision PDF.

• NOV232005_01B2203 — Appeal dismissed
  Potential researcher/environmental-impact case; use cautiously because it is an older nonprecedent decision and the source itself should be cited for facts. Official decision PDF.

• APR212021_03B2203 — Appeal dismissed
  Strong case for an individually cited final-merits example in engineering: distinguish initial criterion acceptance from the later totality analysis and avoid generalizing client-specific evidence. Official decision PDF.

AAO decisions are individual, nonprecedent records. Distinguish the Director’s findings, petitioner assertions, the AAO’s holding, remand directions, and any issue not reached. Historical decisions may apply an earlier legal framework; this research is not current filing advice.

Current framework and corrections

For the current regulatory framework, consult the USCIS Policy Manual. Read the source and corrections methodology before relying on an extracted summary.

Open the full AAO decision archive.