AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision APR082019_01B2203: Published material about the person

AAO EB-1A decision APR082019_01B2203: Published material about the person

EB-1A published material about the person — AAO decision APR082019_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official…

Decision summary: AAO decision APR082019_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Only the artistic-display criterion was met; the decision dismissed at the initial evidentiary stage and did not conduct a distinct final-merits determination.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: The source decision identifies an EB-1A Form I-140 petition under INA §203(b)(1)(A).. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

APR082019_01B2203

Decision date as printed

2019-04-08

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary ability under INA §203(b)(1)(A)

Procedural posture

AAO appeal of EB-1A denial; appeal dismissed.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed

Final-merits status

Only the artistic-display criterion was met; the decision dismissed at the initial evidentiary stage and did not conduct a distinct final-merits determination.

What the AAO decision addressed

Only the artistic-display criterion was met; the decision dismissed at the initial evidentiary stage and did not conduct a distinct final-merits determination.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not considered — source PDF

Membership

Not considered — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not met — p. 2, p. 3

Judging the work of others

Not considered — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not met — p. 3, p. 4, p. 5

Scholarly authorship

Not considered — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

met — p. 6

Leading or critical role

Not met — p. 6, p. 7

High salary or remuneration

Not considered — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not considered — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: The petition concerned work as a photographer in visual arts.; pages: 1; 2

  • claim: Articles and online features did not establish qualifying published material about the petitioner; some coverage concerned dresses or other subjects, and audience/circulation evidence was insufficient.; pages: 2; 3

  • claim: Letters praising the petitioner did not establish original contributions of major significance to the field.; pages: 3; 4; 5

  • claim: The petitioner established display of work in artistic exhibitions or showcases; the AAO accepted this criterion.; pages: 6

  • claim: The asserted roles at media companies/projects did not establish a leading or critical role for distinguished organizations.; pages: 6; 7

  • claim: Only one criterion was met; the appeal was dismissed without a distinct final-merits determination.; pages: 7; 8

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Performance sector research

  • Final Merits research

  • Waiv research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for APR082019_01B2203