AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision MAR132007_01B2203: Awards

AAO EB-1A decision MAR132007_01B2203: Awards

EB-1A awards — AAO decision MAR132007_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed AAO found award, contribution, display, role, salary, and commercial-success criteria unmet; it withdrew the separate finding on prospective U.S. benefit.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: Cover and discussion identify an extraordinary-ability petition under INA 203(b)(1)(A).. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

MAR132007_01B2203

Decision date as printed

2007-03-13 (filename ID date; cover date field is partly illegible)

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary ability in the arts

Procedural posture

AAO appeal of denial; appeal dismissed.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed

Final-merits status

The decision expressly finds fewer than three criteria; it separately discusses overall acclaim but no formal Kazarian final-merits determination is reached.

What the AAO decision addressed

AAO found award, contribution, display, role, salary, and commercial-success criteria unmet; it withdrew the separate finding on prospective U.S. benefit.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not met — p. 3

Membership

Not considered — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not considered — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not considered — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not met — p. 4

Scholarly authorship

Not considered — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not met — p. 4

Leading or critical role

Not met — p. 5

High salary or remuneration

Not met — p. 5

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not met — p. 5, p. 6

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: Petitioner was a Tibetan singer, composer, and musician; evidence included nominations for Tibetan Music Awards, recordings, tours, and letters from arts contacts.; pages: 2; 3; 4; 5

  • claim: AAO found award nominations/regional recognition did not establish a qualifying nationally/internationally recognized award; contributions and performance display claims failed.; pages: 3; 4

  • claim: TIPA lead-vocalist/tour evidence did not establish a leading/critical role for a distinguished organization; salary comparison evidence was absent.; pages: 4; 5

  • claim: Commercial-success evidence showed production figures and limited sales (including a retailer report of 222 CDs), not high sales volume, receipts, or record audiences.; pages: 5; 6

  • claim: AAO found fewer than three criteria and aggregate evidence insufficient to show sustained acclaim/top-of-field status.; pages: 6; 7

  • claim: AAO withdrew the director’s finding that the petitioner failed to show prospective U.S. benefit, but dismissed appeal because extraordinary-ability eligibility was not established.; pages: 7; 8

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Performance sector research

  • Final Merits research

  • Waiv research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for MAR132007_01B2203