AAO EB-1A decision Apr232009_04B2203

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID Apr232009_04B2203 Decision date 2009-04-23 Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed Yes

Criteria Discussed

• awards

• judging

• leading_critical_role

• membership

• original_contributions

• published_material

• scholarly_articles

Criteria Accepted

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

Criteria Rejected

• awards

• judging

• leading_critical_role

• membership

• original_contributions

• scholarly_articles

Core Lesson

Provide concrete, independent documentation for awards and demonstrate personal, not delegated, judging authority; merely being a student or reviewer is insufficient for EB‑1A criteria.

Evidence Issue

• Official award documentation confirming receipt of the Best Paper award.

• Independent evidence showing the petitioner exercised independent judging authority.

• Proof that the petitioner’s role was leading or critical rather than subordinate.

• Documentation that membership organization mandates outstanding achievements.

• Evidence demonstrating the petitioner’s contributions had major significance to the field.

• Clear citation records linking the petitioner to the scholarly articles claimed.

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.