AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision APR072023_01B2203

Generic or vague documentation of awards, salary, or contributions is insufficient; petitioners must provide concrete, quantifiable evidence of national/international significance and impact to satisfy EB‑1A criteria. specific, quantifiable evidence that the award is nationally or internationally re

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID APR072023_01B2203 Decision date not stated Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed Yes

Criteria Discussed

  • awards

  • high_salary

  • judging

  • leading_critical_role

  • membership

  • original_contributions

Criteria Accepted

  • judging

Criteria Rejected

  • awards

  • high_salary

  • leading_critical_role

  • membership

  • original_contributions

Core Lesson

Generic or vague documentation of awards, salary, or contributions is insufficient; petitioners must provide concrete, quantifiable evidence of national/international significance and impact to satisfy EB‑1A criteria.

Evidence Issue

  • specific, quantifiable evidence that the award is nationally or internationally recognized

  • comparative salary data demonstrating high remuneration in the field

  • documentation proving a leading or critical role in the organization

  • detailed examples showing the petitioner’s contributions are of major significance to the field

  • concrete impact metrics or industry adoption evidence

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.