AAO EB-1A decision AUG262005_01B2203

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID AUG262005_01B2203 Decision date not stated Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed No / not stated

Criteria Discussed

• awards

• high_salary

• judging

• leading_critical_role

• membership

• original_contributions

• published_material

• scholarly_articles

Criteria Accepted

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

Criteria Rejected

• awards

• high_salary

• judging

• leading_critical_role

• membership

• original_contributions

• published_material

• scholarly_articles

Core Lesson

Provide complete, verifiable documentation for every EB-1A criterion; missing translations, absent salary proof, and lack of concrete evidence of sustained acclaim will result in denial.

Evidence Issue

• Documentation of income for high salary criterion.

• Complete, certified English translations and circulation proof for published media articles.

• Evidence of actual judging duties beyond invitation letters.

• Proof of distinguished reputation of organizations for leading or critical role.

• Evidence that membership required outstanding achievements.

• Specific identification of a major, recognized contribution.

• Awards that demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim.

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.