AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision AUG162022_01B2203

A patent or invention alone is rarely enough to meet the EB‑1A original‑contributions criterion; you must provide clear, independent evidence of its impact and widespread recognition. Concrete evidence that the patent generated widespread interest among researchers; Independent proof of the signific

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID AUG162022_01B2203 Decision date 2022-08-16 Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed No / not stated

Criteria Discussed

  • judging

  • membership

  • original_contributions

  • scholarly_articles

Criteria Accepted

  • judging

  • scholarly_articles

Criteria Rejected

  • original_contributions

Core Lesson

A patent or invention alone is rarely enough to meet the EB‑1A original‑contributions criterion; you must provide clear, independent evidence of its impact and widespread recognition.

Evidence Issue

  • Concrete evidence that the patent generated widespread interest among researchers

  • Independent proof of the significance or impact of the alleged breakthrough

  • Documentation of a one-time major internationally recognized award or achievement

  • Sufficient evidence to satisfy the gateway requirement of meeting at least three criteria

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.