AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision APR022013_01B2203: industrial engineering and original contributions evidence pitfalls for eb‑1a

To satisfy the EB‑1A original contributions criterion, you must supply concrete documentary evidence—such as citations, peer recognition, and demonstrable impact—rather than merely describing unique skills or experience. Specific examples of how the petitioner’s work advanced the field.; Documentary

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID APR022013_01B2203 Decision date not stated Outcome dismissed Field or occupation industrial engineering Final merits discussed No / not stated

Criteria Discussed

  • commercial_success

  • high_salary

  • judging

  • leading_critical_role

  • membership

  • original_contributions

  • scholarly_articles

Criteria Accepted

  • scholarly_articles

Criteria Rejected

  • high_salary

  • leading_critical_role

  • original_contributions

  • membership

Core Lesson

To satisfy the EB‑1A original contributions criterion, you must supply concrete documentary evidence—such as citations, peer recognition, and demonstrable impact—rather than merely describing unique skills or experience.

Evidence Issue

  • Specific examples of how the petitioner’s work advanced the field.

  • Documentary evidence of citations or peer recognition.

  • Demonstrable impact of the original contributions on industrial engineering.

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.