AAO research
AAO EB-1A decision AUG112005_07B2203
Provide thorough, translated documentation that clearly shows national or international acclaim for every EB‑1A criterion—award prestige, selective membership, major media coverage, and first‑hand judging activity—to avoid common denial reasons. Complete, certified English translations of award crit
Decision Snapshot
Field Value --- --- Decision ID AUG112005_07B2203 Decision date 2005-08-11 Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed Yes
Criteria Discussed
awards
judging
membership
published_material
scholarly_articles
Criteria Accepted
Not stated in the extracted decision plan.
Criteria Rejected
awards
judging
membership
published_material
scholarly_articles
Core Lesson
Provide thorough, translated documentation that clearly shows national or international acclaim for every EB‑1A criterion—award prestige, selective membership, major media coverage, and first‑hand judging activity—to avoid common denial reasons.
Evidence Issue
Complete, certified English translations of award criteria and documentation
Statistical information showing the rarity and prestige of the award
Evidence that the professional association requires outstanding achievement for admission (e.g., bylaws, selection criteria)
Circulation numbers or readership statistics demonstrating national/international distribution of the publications
First‑hand documentation (e.g., signed letters, official appointment letters) confirming the petitioner actually served as a judge
Readership or sales figures proving the book/articles have significant national or international impact
How This Connects
This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.
Source Note
Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.