AAO EB-1A decision AUG112005_01B2203

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID AUG112005_01B2203 Decision date not stated in the extraction Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed Yes

Criteria Discussed

• awards

• judging

• membership

• published_material

• scholarly_articles

Criteria Accepted

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

Criteria Rejected

• awards

• judging

• membership

• published_material

• scholarly_articles

Core Lesson

Concrete, quantitative documentation is essential for each EB‑1A criterion; generic claims and missing metrics lead to denial.

Evidence Issue

• Quantitative data demonstrating the prestige and national/international recognition of the award.

• First‑hand evidence (e.g., signed minutes, invitations) confirming the petitioner’s participation as a judge.

• Proof that the professional associations require outstanding achievement for membership.

• Evidence of major media attention, readership numbers, and that the publications were primarily about the petitioner.

• Citation metrics, readership statistics, or major‑media coverage showing the scholarly work’s national or international impact.

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.