AAO EB-1A decision APR272005_10B2203: Electrical Engineering and published-material evidence pitfalls for eb-1a

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID APR272005_10B2203 Decision date not stated in the extraction Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Electrical Engineering Final merits discussed Yes

Criteria Discussed

• awards

• high_salary

• judging

• leading_critical_role

• membership

• original_contributions

• published_material

• scholarly_articles

Criteria Accepted

• high_salary

Criteria Rejected

• awards

• judging

• leading_critical_role

• membership

• original_contributions

• published_material

• scholarly_articles

Core Lesson

AAO requires nationally/internationally recognized awards, demonstrable authority to judge others' work, and membership in associations that select members for outstanding achievement; institutional or local recognitions, simple voting, or scholastic‑based memberships are insufficient.

Evidence Issue

• No nationally or internationally recognized prize; award was institutional in scope

• Voting on technical standards does not constitute judging the work of others

• Memberships were based on scholastic criteria and selected at local/regional level, not for outstanding achievement at national or international level

• No evidence that petitioner’s work was the primary subject of major media articles

• Insufficient proof that original contributions attracted significant attention beyond MIT graduate students or were widely implemented

• Scholarly articles did not show petitioner as primary author or subject

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.