AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision APR262005_05B2203

Poster awards, society memberships, and routine peer‑review activities are rarely enough to satisfy the EB‑1A awards, membership, or judging criteria; petitioners must provide clear evidence of broad, prestigious recognition and that the organization requires outstanding achievement. Evidence that t

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID APR262005_05B2203 Decision date not stated in the extraction Outcome motion_granted Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed Yes

Criteria Discussed

  • awards

  • judging

  • membership

  • original_contributions

  • scholarly_articles

Criteria Accepted

  • original_contributions

  • scholarly_articles

Criteria Rejected

  • awards

  • judging

  • membership

Core Lesson

Poster awards, society memberships, and routine peer‑review activities are rarely enough to satisfy the EB‑1A awards, membership, or judging criteria; petitioners must provide clear evidence of broad, prestigious recognition and that the organization requires outstanding achievement.

Evidence Issue

  • Evidence that the poster awards were widely recognized beyond the conference context

  • Documentation of specific criteria used to grant the poster award

  • Proof that the societies require outstanding achievement for membership (bylaws, selection criteria)

  • Evidence that peer‑review activities are limited to a small elite and elevate the petitioner above most researchers

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.