AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision APR182016_02B2203

Provide complete translations and detailed, independent evidence that directly satisfies the plain‑language requirements of each EB‑1A criterion; otherwise the AAO will dismiss the petition. English translations for foreign‑language certificates and publications; Independent, third‑party evidence of

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID APR182016_02B2203 Decision date not stated in the extraction Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed No / not stated

Criteria Discussed

  • artistic_display

  • awards

  • commercial_success

  • high_salary

  • judging

  • leading_critical_role

  • membership

  • original_contributions

  • published_material

  • scholarly_articles

Criteria Accepted

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

Criteria Rejected

  • awards

  • commercial_success

  • high_salary

  • leading_critical_role

  • membership

  • original_contributions

  • scholarly_articles

Core Lesson

Provide complete translations and detailed, independent evidence that directly satisfies the plain‑language requirements of each EB‑1A criterion; otherwise the AAO will dismiss the petition.

Evidence Issue

  • English translations for foreign‑language certificates and publications

  • Independent, third‑party evidence of the organization’s distinguished reputation

  • Detailed description of duties and impact for claimed leadership roles

  • Clear documentation showing major significance of contributions to the field

  • Evidence that meets the plain‑language requirements of each criterion

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.