AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision AUG302024_01B2203

For the EB‑1A "Published Material About the Beneficiary" criterion, evidence must directly focus on the beneficiary’s achievements; generic articles, brief mentions, or team‑focused coverage do not satisfy the requirement. Evidence that directly discusses the beneficiary’s work; the material must be

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID AUG302024_01B2203 Decision date not stated in the extraction Outcome remanded Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed No / not stated

Criteria Discussed

  • artistic_display

  • awards

  • commercial_success

  • high_salary

  • judging

  • leading_critical_role

  • membership

  • original_contributions

  • published_material

  • scholarly_articles

Criteria Accepted

  • high_salary

  • scholarly_articles

Criteria Rejected

  • published_material

Core Lesson

For the EB‑1A "Published Material About the Beneficiary" criterion, evidence must directly focus on the beneficiary’s achievements; generic articles, brief mentions, or team‑focused coverage do not satisfy the requirement.

Evidence Issue

  • Evidence that directly discusses the beneficiary’s work; the material must be about the beneficiary, not merely mention them.

  • Substantive coverage of the beneficiary’s contributions rather than generic or team‑focused articles.

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.