AAO EB-1A decision AUG252020_06B2203: acting and published-material evidence pitfalls for eb-1a

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID AUG252020_06B2203 Decision date 2020-08-25 Outcome dismissed Field or occupation acting Final merits discussed Yes

Criteria Discussed

• awards

• judging

• leading_critical_role

• membership

• original_contributions

• published_material

Criteria Accepted

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

Criteria Rejected

• awards

• judging

• original_contributions

• published_material

Core Lesson

Petitioners must provide verifiable, detailed documentation for awards, publications, and judging activities; vague claims without supporting records lead to denial.

Evidence Issue

• Corroborating documentation for claimed awards (certificates, press coverage, evidence of prize significance).

• Complete bibliographic details for published material (title, date, author, publication venue, circulation/traffic data).

• Adequate proof that the judging letter meets the standard for the judging criterion.

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.