AAO EB-1A decision AUG242022_02B2203

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID AUG242022_02B2203 Decision date 2022-08-24 Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed No / not stated

Criteria Discussed

• artistic_display

• awards

• judging

• leading_critical_role

• membership

• published_material

• scholarly_articles

Criteria Accepted

• awards

• judging

Criteria Rejected

• artistic_display

• leading_critical_role

• membership

• published_material

• scholarly_articles

Core Lesson

Petitioners must provide concrete documentation for at least three EB‑1A criteria; missing bylaws for membership and incomplete publication details are common reasons for denial.

Evidence Issue

• Association bylaws or clear eligibility requirements for the claimed membership.

• Full citation details (publication name, date, source) to prove articles appeared in professional or major trade publications.

• Concrete evidence that the petitioner’s role was significant enough to be considered leading or critical.

• Comparable evidence to support authorship of scholarly work (seminar flyer insufficient).

• Demonstration that the artistic display satisfies the plain‑language of the criterion.

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.