AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision AUG202023_01B2203

When submitting award‑related evidence, include complete citation details (author, journal, date) and ensure the supporting documentation directly aligns with the petitioner’s declared specialty. Missing authorship and publication information for the award‑related article; Insufficient documentation

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID AUG202023_01B2203 Decision date not stated in the extraction Outcome remanded Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed No / not stated

Criteria Discussed

  • awards

  • original_contributions

  • published_material

Criteria Accepted

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

Criteria Rejected

  • awards

  • original_contributions

Core Lesson

When submitting award‑related evidence, include complete citation details (author, journal, date) and ensure the supporting documentation directly aligns with the petitioner’s declared specialty.

Evidence Issue

  • Missing authorship and publication information for the award‑related article

  • Insufficient documentation to satisfy the original contributions criterion

  • Petitioner did not meet the required three of ten evidentiary criteria

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.