AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision AUG162024_02B2203

Ensure you can clearly document that any awards are nationally or internationally recognized and that you satisfy at least three of the ten EB‑1A criteria before relying on other criteria. No proof that awards are nationally or internationally recognized; No evidence of judging others in the field;

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID AUG162024_02B2203 Decision date 2024-08-16 Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed No / not stated

Criteria Discussed

  • awards

  • judging

  • leading_critical_role

  • original_contributions

  • published_material

Criteria Accepted

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

Criteria Rejected

  • awards

  • judging

  • published_material

Core Lesson

Ensure you can clearly document that any awards are nationally or internationally recognized and that you satisfy at least three of the ten EB‑1A criteria before relying on other criteria.

Evidence Issue

  • No proof that awards are nationally or internationally recognized

  • No evidence of judging others in the field

  • Petitioner did not meet the minimum three‑criterion threshold

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.