AAO research
AAO EB-1A decision Aug132009_01B2203: professional shooter / shooting trainer and common pitfalls in proving awards for eb‑1a
To satisfy EB‑1A award, membership, and published‑material criteria, provide certified documentation that clearly demonstrates national/international recognition, complete citation details, and evidence of the organization’s elite standards. certified translations of award documentation; evidence th
Decision Snapshot
Field Value --- --- Decision ID Aug132009_01B2203 Decision date 2009-08-13 Outcome dismissed Field or occupation professional shooter / shooting trainer Final merits discussed Yes
Criteria Discussed
awards
high_salary
leading_critical_role
membership
original_contributions
published_material
Criteria Accepted
Not stated in the extracted decision plan.
Criteria Rejected
awards
high_salary
leading_critical_role
membership
original_contributions
published_material
Core Lesson
To satisfy EB‑1A award, membership, and published‑material criteria, provide certified documentation that clearly demonstrates national/international recognition, complete citation details, and evidence of the organization’s elite standards.
Evidence Issue
certified translations of award documentation
evidence that awards were nationally or internationally recognized and received in top‑level competition
bylaws or other proof that membership organizations admit only individuals with outstanding achievements
complete citation details (author, date, publication) for articles and proof that articles focus on the petitioner
documentation of original contributions that significantly impacted the field
salary evidence showing it reflects professional shooting work rather than generic sales management
How This Connects
This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.
Source Note
Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.