AAO research
AAO EB-1A decision AUG022013_01B2203
EB-1A petitions must supply concrete, verifiable evidence for each claimed criterion; generic or incomplete documentation (e.g., single awards, missing box‑office or salary data, vague membership proof) leads to denial. concrete, verifiable award documentation (plural awards); specific box office fi
Decision Snapshot
Field Value --- --- Decision ID AUG022013_01B2203 Decision date 2013-08-02 Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed Yes
Criteria Discussed
artistic_display
awards
commercial_success
high_salary
judging
leading_critical_role
membership
original_contributions
published_material
scholarly_articles
Criteria Accepted
Not stated in the extracted decision plan.
Criteria Rejected
artistic_display
awards
commercial_success
high_salary
judging
leading_critical_role
membership
original_contributions
published_material
scholarly_articles
Core Lesson
EB-1A petitions must supply concrete, verifiable evidence for each claimed criterion; generic or incomplete documentation (e.g., single awards, missing box‑office or salary data, vague membership proof) leads to denial.
Evidence Issue
concrete, verifiable award documentation (plural awards)
specific box office figures
salary comparables for the petitioner’s occupation
evidence linking job duties to organizational success
detailed membership bylaws and proof of selective membership
authorship proof, proper translations, and evidence of major media coverage
scholarly article criteria (peer‑reviewed, substantive contribution)
How This Connects
This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.
Source Note
Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.