AAO research
AAO EB-1A decision APR292026_02B2203
Meeting only two EB‑1A criteria is insufficient; petitioners must provide clear, independent evidence that at least three criteria are satisfied and avoid treating certificates, participation letters, or non‑artistic venues as awards or artistic exhibitions. Independent, nationally or internationall
Decision Snapshot
Field Value --- --- Decision ID APR292026_02B2203 Decision date 2026-04-29 Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed Yes
Criteria Discussed
artistic_display
awards
commercial_success
high_salary
judging
leading_critical_role
membership
original_contributions
published_material
scholarly_articles
Criteria Accepted
judging
scholarly_articles
Criteria Rejected
artistic_display
awards
commercial_success
high_salary
leading_critical_role
membership
original_contributions
published_material
Core Lesson
Meeting only two EB‑1A criteria is insufficient; petitioners must provide clear, independent evidence that at least three criteria are satisfied and avoid treating certificates, participation letters, or non‑artistic venues as awards or artistic exhibitions.
Evidence Issue
Independent, nationally or internationally recognized awards of major significance
Evidence that memberships are selective and based on outstanding achievement
Proof that salary is high relative to peers in the field
Demonstration of sustained national or international acclaim
Major, original contributions of significance to the field
Publications directly about the petitioner’s work
How This Connects
This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.
Source Note
Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.