AAO EB-1A decision APR282005_03B2203

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID APR282005_03B2203 Decision date not stated Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed Yes

Criteria Discussed

• artistic_display

• awards

• leading_critical_role

• original_contributions

• published_material

• scholarly_articles

Criteria Accepted

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

Criteria Rejected

• artistic_display

• awards

• leading_critical_role

• original_contributions

• published_material

Core Lesson

Scientific conference presentations, regional awards, and patents alone do not satisfy EB‑1A criteria; petitioners must provide concrete evidence of national/international acclaim, wide utilization, and citation impact.

Evidence Issue

• Evidence that awards had national or international significance beyond the specific events

• Proof that the petitioner was the leading force behind the award‑winning product or data recovery effort

• Documentation showing wide utilization or influence of patented inventions

• Demonstration of significant national distribution for the newspaper article

• Citation metrics or other indicators of impact for the journal articles

• Applicability of the artistic display criterion to scientific or engineering presentations

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.