AAO EB-1A decision APR272005_02B2203: Electrical Engineering and published-material evidence pitfalls for eb-1a

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID APR272005_02B2203 Decision date not stated in the extraction Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Electrical Engineering Final merits discussed Yes

Criteria Discussed

• awards

• high_salary

• judging

• leading_critical_role

• membership

• original_contributions

• published_material

• scholarly_articles

Criteria Accepted

• high_salary

Criteria Rejected

• awards

• judging

• leading_critical_role

• membership

• original_contributions

• published_material

• scholarly_articles

Core Lesson

Institutional or local recognitions (awards, society memberships, standard‑voting, patents, minor media mentions) are insufficient for EB‑1A; evidence must demonstrate national or international acclaim and impact.

Evidence Issue

• No evidence of a nationally or internationally recognized prize; awards were institutional in scope

• Memberships were based on scholastic achievement and selected at local/regional level, not national/international

• Voting on technical standards does not constitute judging the work of others

• No citation history or evidence of influence for the scholarly article

• Original contributions lacked national/international recognition and widespread implementation

• Patent filing alone does not demonstrate a contribution of major significance

• Published media article did not make petitioner the primary subject

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.