AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision APR252023_01B2203

Scientific presentations do not satisfy the EB‑1A artistic display requirement, and award evidence must clearly describe the selection process and competition level; without at least three met criteria, a petition will be dismissed even if some criteria are withdrawn. Evidence that scientific presen

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID APR252023_01B2203 Decision date 2023-04-25 Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed Yes

Criteria Discussed

  • artistic_display

  • awards

  • commercial_success

  • high_salary

  • judging

  • leading_critical_role

  • membership

  • original_contributions

  • published_material

  • scholarly_articles

Criteria Accepted

  • judging

  • scholarly_articles

Criteria Rejected

  • artistic_display

  • awards

  • commercial_success

  • high_salary

  • leading_critical_role

  • original_contributions

Core Lesson

Scientific presentations do not satisfy the EB‑1A artistic display requirement, and award evidence must clearly describe the selection process and competition level; without at least three met criteria, a petition will be dismissed even if some criteria are withdrawn.

Evidence Issue

  • Evidence that scientific presentations constitute an artistic exhibition.

  • Detailed description of award selection procedures and the competitive nature of the award.

  • Comparative salary data showing the petitioner’s earnings are significantly higher than peers.

  • Proof of a leading or critical role within the organization (e.g., job descriptions, impact statements).

  • Citation metrics or comparative citation analysis to demonstrate marked impact of the petitioner’s work.

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.