AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision Apr252012_01B2203: gymnastics coaching and original contributions evidence pitfalls for eb-1a

Awards must be the alien’s own nationally/internationally recognized prizes; membership must be in multiple recognized associations; a single high salary or judging panel suffices, but the evidence must satisfy the plain‑language requirements. Evidence that the petitioner personally received nationa

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID Apr252012_01B2203 Decision date 2012-04-25 Outcome dismissed Field or occupation gymnastics coaching Final merits discussed No / not stated

Criteria Discussed

  • awards

  • high_salary

  • judging

  • leading_critical_role

  • membership

  • original_contributions

  • published_material

Criteria Accepted

  • judging

Criteria Rejected

  • awards

  • high_salary

  • leading_critical_role

  • membership

  • published_material

Core Lesson

Awards must be the alien’s own nationally/internationally recognized prizes; membership must be in multiple recognized associations; a single high salary or judging panel suffices, but the evidence must satisfy the plain‑language requirements.

Evidence Issue

  • Evidence that the petitioner personally received nationally or internationally recognized awards.

  • Membership in multiple recognized professional associations (plural requirement).

  • Clear documentation of a single high salary meeting the plain‑language standard.

  • Recent (post‑2001) national or international acclaim.

  • Complete citation details (author, publication) for claimed articles.

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.