AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision APR192025_01B2203

Meeting only one or two EB‑1A criteria is not enough; the record must collectively demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim and that the applicant is among the top few percent in the field. Evidence connecting memberships to national or international recognition.; Evidence showing jud

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID APR192025_01B2203 Decision date not stated in the extraction Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed Yes

Criteria Discussed

  • high_salary

  • judging

  • membership

  • scholarly_articles

Criteria Accepted

  • scholarly_articles

Criteria Rejected

  • high_salary

  • judging

  • membership

Core Lesson

Meeting only one or two EB‑1A criteria is not enough; the record must collectively demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim and that the applicant is among the top few percent in the field.

Evidence Issue

  • Evidence connecting memberships to national or international recognition.

  • Evidence showing judging activities contributed to a sustained record of acclaim.

  • Evidence that salary reflects top‑percent status in the field.

  • Overall documentation that the petitioner is among the small percentage at the very top of the field.

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.