AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision Apr192012_01B2203

Filing an EB-1A petition after the statutory deadline results in automatic rejection, regardless of the petition's substantive merits. The decision only addresses a procedural deadline issue with no substantive merit analysis.

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID Apr192012_01B2203 Decision date 2012-04-19 Outcome rejected Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed No / not stated

Criteria Discussed

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

Criteria Accepted

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

Criteria Rejected

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

Core Lesson

Filing an EB-1A petition after the statutory deadline results in automatic rejection, regardless of the petition's substantive merits.

Evidence Issue

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.