AAO EB-1A decision APR162021_03B2203: Acting / Film and published-material evidence pitfalls for eb-1a

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID APR162021_03B2203 Decision date not stated in the extraction Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Acting / Film Final merits discussed No / not stated

Criteria Discussed

• high_salary

• judging

• leading_critical_role

• membership

• original_contributions

• published_material

Criteria Accepted

• judging

• published_material

Criteria Rejected

• high_salary

• leading_critical_role

• original_contributions

Core Lesson

Provide concrete comparative salary data, verifiable membership requirements, and clear, independent evidence of leading roles and original contributions; merely mentioning the petitioner in minor articles or claiming membership without documented elite criteria will not satisfy EB‑1A standards.

Evidence Issue

• Comparative salary data to substantiate the high‑salary criterion

• Clear documentation that commercial appearances constitute a leading or critical role in a distinguished organization

• Evidence that the claimed professional organization requires outstanding achievement and that its membership committee consists of recognized experts

• Concrete, independent proof of original contributions of major significance (letters were deemed conclusory)

• Published material in a major medium that directly discusses the petitioner’s work

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.