AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision APR162019_02B2203: dentistry and failure to meet the three-criterion threshold

Meeting only one EB‑1A criterion is insufficient; applicants must satisfy at least three criteria, and membership must be based on peer‑judged distinction, not merely certification or elected positions. Evidence that the petitioner’s role was of significant importance to the organization’s activitie

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID APR162019_02B2203 Decision date not stated in the extraction Outcome dismissed Field or occupation dentistry Final merits discussed No / not stated

Criteria Discussed

  • judging

  • leading_critical_role

  • membership

  • original_contributions

Criteria Accepted

  • judging

Criteria Rejected

  • leading_critical_role

  • membership

  • original_contributions

Core Lesson

Meeting only one EB‑1A criterion is insufficient; applicants must satisfy at least three criteria, and membership must be based on peer‑judged distinction, not merely certification or elected positions.

Evidence Issue

  • Evidence that the petitioner’s role was of significant importance to the organization’s activities

  • Proof that membership was based on outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts

  • Documentation showing original contributions that had a substantial impact on the field

  • Clear intent to continue working in the field of dentistry

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.