AAO EB-1A decision APR112006_03B2203

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID APR112006_03B2203 Decision date not stated in the extraction Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed Yes

Criteria Discussed

• awards

• judging

• leading_critical_role

• membership

• original_contributions

• published_material

• scholarly_articles

Criteria Accepted

• awards

Criteria Rejected

• judging

• leading_critical_role

• membership

• original_contributions

• published_material

• scholarly_articles

Core Lesson

A single award, membership, or publication is rarely enough; you must provide concrete, nationally‑recognizable evidence for each claimed EB‑1A criterion, including clear documentation of role significance, selection standards, and citation impact.

Evidence Issue

• Evidence that petitioner evaluated scientific professionals at a national level (judging criterion)

• Bylaws or explicit admission requirements showing membership based on outstanding achievement

• Documentation that petitioner’s role was leading or critical within the organization

• Proof that the petitioner’s work is unusually influential, highly acclaimed, or of major significance

• Publications where petitioner is the main subject and that demonstrate national/international acclaim

• Citation data or independent recognition for the single scholarly article

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.