AAO EB-1A decision Apr112006_01B2203

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID Apr112006_01B2203 Decision date not stated in the extraction Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed Yes

Criteria Discussed

• awards

• judging

• leading_critical_role

• membership

• original_contributions

• published_material

• scholarly_articles

Criteria Accepted

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

Criteria Rejected

• awards

• judging

• leading_critical_role

• membership

• original_contributions

• published_material

• scholarly_articles

Core Lesson

Without certified translations and independent proof of prestige, awards, memberships, and self‑published editorial work will not satisfy EB‑1A criteria for national or international acclaim.

Evidence Issue

• Certified translations for award documentation.

• Independent evidence that awards are prestigious and widely recognized.

• Bylaws or admission criteria proving memberships require outstanding achievement and expert review.

• Proof that publications qualify as major media and reach a substantial national audience.

• Independent metrics or citations showing the journal’s national/international readership.

• Independent evidence that the petitioner’s judging/editorial role meets the “sustained acclaim” standard.

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.