AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision Dec162010_01B2203: law and procedural dismissals in eb-1a appeals

Without concrete documentary evidence, claims for membership, scholarly articles, judging, and awards will be rejected. Documentary evidence supporting the judging criterion.; Evidence that membership requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts.; Proof that the petitioner’s articl

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID Dec162010_01B2203 Decision date not stated in the extraction Outcome dismissed Field or occupation law Final merits discussed No / not stated

Criteria Discussed

  • awards

  • judging

  • leading_critical_role

  • membership

  • original_contributions

  • published_material

  • scholarly_articles

Criteria Accepted

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

Criteria Rejected

  • judging

  • membership

  • published_material

  • scholarly_articles

Core Lesson

Without concrete documentary evidence, claims for membership, scholarly articles, judging, and awards will be rejected.

Evidence Issue

  • Documentary evidence supporting the judging criterion.

  • Evidence that membership requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts.

  • Proof that the petitioner’s articles were published in professional or major trade publications.

  • Documentation that the petitioner’s self‑authored pieces qualify as published material about her work.

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.