AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision DEC062016_01B2203: radiology and failure to meet the three‑criterion threshold (waiver/abandonment)

Academic fellowships, peer‑review activities, and membership letters must be paired with explicit evidence of national/international acclaim and clear descriptions of leading or critical roles; otherwise the awards, judging, and leadership criteria will be rejected. Evidence that the academic fellow

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID DEC062016_01B2203 Decision date not stated in the extraction Outcome dismissed Field or occupation radiology Final merits discussed Yes

Criteria Discussed

  • awards

  • high_salary

  • judging

  • leading_critical_role

  • membership

  • original_contributions

  • published_material

  • scholarly_articles

Criteria Accepted

  • high_salary

  • judging

  • scholarly_articles

Criteria Rejected

  • awards

  • leading_critical_role

  • membership

  • original_contributions

  • published_material

Core Lesson

Academic fellowships, peer‑review activities, and membership letters must be paired with explicit evidence of national/international acclaim and clear descriptions of leading or critical roles; otherwise the awards, judging, and leadership criteria will be rejected.

Evidence Issue

  • Evidence that the academic fellowship constitutes a major, internationally recognized award.

  • Letters explicitly describing a leading or critical role in the petitioner’s work.

  • Documentation that the professional society membership requires outstanding achievement.

  • Recommendation letters that identify original contributions of major significance.

  • Citation evidence or other proof that published material demonstrates sustained national or international acclaim.

  • Evidence of the reputation or standing of the publications used for the judging criterion.

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.