AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision AUG272025_04B2203

Submit concrete, verifiable evidence for each claimed EB‑1A criterion; meeting only two criteria (e.g., judging and scholarly articles) does not satisfy the three‑criterion threshold. Evidence that awards were nationally or internationally recognized.; Verified proof of membership and that the organ

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID AUG272025_04B2203 Decision date not stated in the extraction Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed No / not stated

Criteria Discussed

  • artistic_display

  • awards

  • high_salary

  • judging

  • leading_critical_role

  • membership

  • original_contributions

  • published_material

  • scholarly_articles

Criteria Accepted

  • judging

  • scholarly_articles

Criteria Rejected

  • artistic_display

  • awards

  • high_salary

  • leading_critical_role

  • membership

  • original_contributions

  • published_material

Core Lesson

Submit concrete, verifiable evidence for each claimed EB‑1A criterion; meeting only two criteria (e.g., judging and scholarly articles) does not satisfy the three‑criterion threshold.

Evidence Issue

  • Evidence that awards were nationally or internationally recognized.

  • Verified proof of membership and that the organization requires outstanding achievement.

  • Salary comparatives or other objective data showing a high salary.

  • Circulation, readership, or viewership statistics for published material, plus complete citation details.

  • Specific documentation showing original contributions of major significance.

  • Proper documentation that scientific presentations qualify as artistic exhibitions.

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.