AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision AUG262014_01B2203

Provide concrete, third‑party documentation that each award is nationally/internationally recognized and ensure any published articles are primarily about you; otherwise the EB‑1A petition will likely be denied. Documentary evidence demonstrating that the listed awards are nationally or internationa

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID AUG262014_01B2203 Decision date not stated in the extraction Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed No / not stated

Criteria Discussed

  • awards

  • judging

  • leading_critical_role

  • membership

  • original_contributions

  • published_material

Criteria Accepted

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

Criteria Rejected

  • awards

  • judging

  • membership

  • original_contributions

  • published_material

Core Lesson

Provide concrete, third‑party documentation that each award is nationally/internationally recognized and ensure any published articles are primarily about you; otherwise the EB‑1A petition will likely be denied.

Evidence Issue

  • Documentary evidence demonstrating that the listed awards are nationally or internationally recognized.

  • Published material where the petitioner is the primary subject and that appears in professional or major trade publications.

  • Evidence linking professional memberships to the petitioner’s outstanding achievements.

  • Specific, third‑party evidence showing the petitioner’s original contributions have major significance in the field.

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.