AAO EB-1A decision AUG122005_24B2203

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID AUG122005_24B2203 Decision date not stated in the extraction Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed Yes

Criteria Discussed

• awards

• commercial_success

• high_salary

• leading_critical_role

• membership

• original_contributions

• published_material

Criteria Accepted

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

Criteria Rejected

• awards

• commercial_success

• high_salary

• leading_critical_role

• membership

• original_contributions

• published_material

Core Lesson

Regional or local achievements alone are insufficient for EB‑1A; applicants must provide clear, nationally recognized evidence of acclaim and impact.

Evidence Issue

• Evidence that the grants constitute recognized prizes or awards

• Comparative salary data showing the beneficiary earns a high salary relative to others in the field

• Proof that the beneficiary’s role was critical to a nationally recognized organization

• Membership in an organization that requires outstanding achievement

• Published material in major trade publications or major media demonstrating national acclaim

• Clear attribution of the company’s commercial success to the beneficiary’s individual contributions

• Any evidence of sustained national or international acclaim beyond regional/local recognition

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.