AAO EB-1A decision AUG122005_20B2203

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID AUG122005_20B2203 Decision date not stated in the extraction Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed Yes

Criteria Discussed

• awards

• judging

• leading_critical_role

• membership

• original_contributions

• published_material

• scholarly_articles

Criteria Accepted

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

Criteria Rejected

• awards

• judging

• leading_critical_role

• membership

• original_contributions

• published_material

• scholarly_articles

Core Lesson

EB-1A petitions are denied when the record lacks direct, verifiable proof of sustained national or international acclaim; generic citations, outdated awards, and unverified memberships do not satisfy the criteria.

Evidence Issue

• No documentation that awards were nationally or internationally recognized or reflect sustained acclaim.

• No proof that petitioner actually accepted judging invitations or evaluated work.

• No evidence establishing a leading or critical role or distinguished reputation.

• Absence of corroborative evidence showing selective membership requirements.

• No published material that substantively discusses the petitioner’s work.

• Citation record did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim.

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.