AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision AUG122005_01B2203

Academic honors such as scholarships, research grants, peer‑review duties, and session‑chair roles rarely satisfy EB‑1A criteria unless they are clearly recognized as major awards, judging positions, or leading/critical contributions. Evidence that scholarships or research grants are prizes or award

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID AUG122005_01B2203 Decision date not stated in the extraction Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed Yes

Criteria Discussed

  • awards

  • judging

  • leading_critical_role

  • membership

  • original_contributions

  • published_material

  • scholarly_articles

Criteria Accepted

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

Criteria Rejected

  • awards

  • judging

  • leading_critical_role

  • original_contributions

  • scholarly_articles

Core Lesson

Academic honors such as scholarships, research grants, peer‑review duties, and session‑chair roles rarely satisfy EB‑1A criteria unless they are clearly recognized as major awards, judging positions, or leading/critical contributions.

Evidence Issue

  • Evidence that scholarships or research grants are prizes or awards for excellence

  • Persuasive proof that peer‑review duties constitute judging of the field

  • Demonstration that session chairing reflects a leading or critical role

  • Citation evidence that the articles are specifically about the petitioner and indicate sustained acclaim

  • Proof that publications have major significance and influence in the field

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.