AAO EB-1A decision Aug042010_01B2203

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID Aug042010_01B2203 Decision date 2010-08-04 Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed Yes

Criteria Discussed

• awards

• commercial_success

• high_salary

• judging

• leading_critical_role

• membership

• original_contributions

• published_material

• scholarly_articles

Criteria Accepted

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

Criteria Rejected

• awards

• high_salary

• leading_critical_role

• membership

• original_contributions

• published_material

• scholarly_articles

Core Lesson

Petitioners must provide clear, documented proof that any awards are nationally or internationally recognized and directly tied to the beneficiary; generic conference invitations, grant mentions, or citations about co‑authors are insufficient.

Evidence Issue

• Clear documentation that the cited awards are nationally or internationally recognized.

• Evidence directly linking the awards and conference invitations to the beneficiary.

• Proof of the organization’s distinguished reputation and that the role was critical.

• Salary documentation meeting the regulatory high‑salary threshold.

• Membership evidence in professional associations.

• Demonstration of impact/significance of original contributions.

• Citations that specifically reference the beneficiary’s work.

• Scholarly articles published in major trade or professional publications.

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.