AAO EB-1A decision AUG022016_01B2203: film industry and published-material evidence pitfalls for eb-1a

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID AUG022016_01B2203 Decision date not stated in the extraction Outcome dismissed Field or occupation film industry Final merits discussed Yes

Criteria Discussed

• artistic_display

• awards

• judging

• leading_critical_role

• original_contributions

• published_material

Criteria Accepted

• artistic_display

• leading_critical_role

Criteria Rejected

• awards

• judging

• original_contributions

• published_material

Core Lesson

Award evidence must be nationally/internationally recognized and supported by concrete documentation; judging that occurs after filing cannot satisfy the judging criterion.

Evidence Issue

• Corroborating evidence of awards (trophies, certificates, photographs).

• Proof that the awards are nationally or internationally recognized.

• Documentation showing the beneficiary was the award recipient.

• Evidence that the judging activity occurred before filing.

• Published material that directly discusses the beneficiary rather than the film.

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.