AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision APR282026_05B2203: ice hockey and published‑material evidence pitfalls for eb‑1a

Generic press coverage that does not explicitly place the petitioner among the very top of the field is insufficient to satisfy the EB‑1A published‑material requirement. Published materials that explicitly demonstrate the petitioner is among the very top percentage of his field; Evidence showing sus

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID APR282026_05B2203 Decision date not stated Outcome dismissed Field or occupation ice hockey Final merits discussed No / not stated

Criteria Discussed

  • published_material

Criteria Accepted

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

Criteria Rejected

  • published_material

Core Lesson

Generic press coverage that does not explicitly place the petitioner among the very top of the field is insufficient to satisfy the EB‑1A published‑material requirement.

Evidence Issue

  • Published materials that explicitly demonstrate the petitioner is among the very top percentage of his field

  • Evidence showing sustained national or international acclaim that rises to the upper echelon

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.