AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision Apr222010_01B2203: Taekwondo / martial arts instructor and published-material evidence pitfalls for eb-1a

Submitting only participation certificates, incomplete salary data, and non‑authoritative publications results in the AAO finding no EB‑1A criteria met and dismissing the petition. Comparative salary evidence or proof of high remuneration; Documentation that awards meet the "major, internationally r

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID Apr222010_01B2203 Decision date 2010-04-22 Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Taekwondo / martial arts instructor Final merits discussed Yes

Criteria Discussed

  • artistic_display

  • awards

  • commercial_success

  • high_salary

  • judging

  • leading_critical_role

  • membership

  • original_contributions

  • published_material

  • scholarly_articles

Criteria Accepted

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

Criteria Rejected

  • artistic_display

  • awards

  • commercial_success

  • high_salary

  • judging

  • leading_critical_role

  • membership

  • original_contributions

  • published_material

  • scholarly_articles

Core Lesson

Submitting only participation certificates, incomplete salary data, and non‑authoritative publications results in the AAO finding no EB‑1A criteria met and dismissing the petition.

Evidence Issue

  • Comparative salary evidence or proof of high remuneration

  • Documentation that awards meet the "major, internationally recognized" standard

  • Evidence that the petitioner actually judged the work of others

  • Membership documentation for professional associations

  • Published material about the petitioner in major trade or professional publications

  • Certified translations and full citation details for scholarly articles

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.