AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision APR152025_01B2203: ballroom dance choreography and common pitfalls in proving awards for eb‑1a

Awards must be independently recognized as nationally or internationally significant and directly related to the claimed field; internal or niche accolades without external validation do not satisfy the EB-1A award criterion. independent, objective evidence that the awards are nationally or internat

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID APR152025_01B2203 Decision date 2025-04-15 Outcome dismissed Field or occupation ballroom dance choreography Final merits discussed No / not stated

Criteria Discussed

  • artistic_display

  • awards

  • high_salary

  • judging

  • leading_critical_role

  • membership

  • original_contributions

  • published_material

Criteria Accepted

  • artistic_display

  • judging

Criteria Rejected

  • awards

  • membership

  • original_contributions

  • published_material

  • high_salary

  • leading_critical_role

Core Lesson

Awards must be independently recognized as nationally or internationally significant and directly related to the claimed field; internal or niche accolades without external validation do not satisfy the EB-1A award criterion.

Evidence Issue

  • independent, objective evidence that the awards are nationally or internationally recognized

  • corroborating publications or media coverage linking the awards to the claimed choreography field

  • evidence that the awards pertain to choreography rather than performance as a dancer

  • proof that membership required outstanding achievements judged by national/international experts

  • objective documentation of the significance of the manual as an original contribution

  • verifiable high salary evidence comparable to peers

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.