AAO research
AAO EB-1A decision APR152024_01B2203
Post‑filing awards or memberships cannot be used to satisfy EB‑1A criteria; all evidence must predate the petition and clearly demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim. Pre‑filing awards or evidence of awards earned before the petition date.; Documentation showing sustained national/i
Decision Snapshot
Field Value --- --- Decision ID APR152024_01B2203 Decision date not stated Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed Yes
Criteria Discussed
awards
judging
leading_critical_role
membership
published_material
Criteria Accepted
Not stated in the extracted decision plan.
Criteria Rejected
awards
judging
leading_critical_role
published_material
Core Lesson
Post‑filing awards or memberships cannot be used to satisfy EB‑1A criteria; all evidence must predate the petition and clearly demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim.
Evidence Issue
Pre‑filing awards or evidence of awards earned before the petition date.
Documentation showing sustained national/international acclaim for judging activities.
Clear, extensive documentation linking the petitioner to the small percentage of top individuals in the field.
Explanation of how published material evidences top‑percentage status.
Membership evidence that predates the filing date.
How This Connects
This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.
Source Note
Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.