AAO EB-1A decision Apr092010_01B2203: musician and published-material evidence pitfalls for eb-1a

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID Apr092010_01B2203 Decision date 2010-04-09 Outcome motion_granted Field or occupation musician Final merits discussed Yes

Criteria Discussed

• artistic_display

• awards

• commercial_success

• judging

• leading_critical_role

• membership

• original_contributions

• published_material

Criteria Accepted

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

Criteria Rejected

• artistic_display

• awards

• commercial_success

• leading_critical_role

• membership

• original_contributions

• published_material

Core Lesson

Falsifying award claims or providing unverified documentation leads to denial of multiple EB-1A criteria; petitioners must submit accurate, independently verifiable evidence of achievements.

Evidence Issue

• Verifiable documentation of award significance and receipt of the claimed prize.

• Concrete sales records or receipts to demonstrate commercial success.

• Evidence that the petitioner’s role was leading or critical in a major project.

• Proof that the membership organization requires outstanding achievement.

• Original contributions of major significance with independent corroboration.

• Published material about the petitioner’s work meeting the regulatory standard.

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.