AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision Apr032008_02B2203

When pursuing EB‑1A, provide concrete, documented proof that you have acted as a judge of others' work; vague claims can be misinterpreted or deemed insufficient. clear, documented evidence that the petitioner served as a judge of the work of others (judging criterion); consistent internal logic lin

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID Apr032008_02B2203 Decision date 2008-04-03 Outcome sustained Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed Yes

Criteria Discussed

  • judging

  • original_contributions

  • scholarly_articles

Criteria Accepted

  • original_contributions

  • scholarly_articles

Criteria Rejected

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

Core Lesson

When pursuing EB‑1A, provide concrete, documented proof that you have acted as a judge of others' work; vague claims can be misinterpreted or deemed insufficient.

Evidence Issue

  • clear, documented evidence that the petitioner served as a judge of the work of others (judging criterion)

  • consistent internal logic linking the met‑count of criteria to the sustained outcome

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.